Container orchestration Representative engagement

Forty machines, one Git repository, no one logging in by hand

Bare metal provisioning plane

Client
Research institute · North America
Region
Single datacentre, two racks
Scale
40 compute nodes · mixed generations · 6 years of drift
Timeline
4 weeks build, 2 weeks rehearsal
Service line
Bare metal & OS layer

Where they started

Machines had been installed by whoever was available, from a wiki page that had stopped being true two years earlier. Three nodes had a RAID layout nobody could explain, and firmware versions ranged across four releases.

The problem, precisely

The team could not safely reinstall a node — the procedure existed only as tribal knowledge — so a failed disk meant a host down for days.

What we did

Replaced the wiki page with a provisioning plane and a machine inventory as the single source of truth. Rack-by-rack roll-through with two spare nodes as a buffer, starting with the least critical rack.

Delivered

  • MAAS as the authoritative machine inventory, synchronised nightly from Redfish
  • iPXE + preseed bring-up with automated RAID, bonding and firmware baseline
  • Ansible roles for OS baseline, network config, package policy and unattended upgrades
  • Firmware drift report, generated weekly and alerted on any deviation
  • Bring-up runbook rehearsed twice with the customer team before handover

Technologies used

  • MAAS 3.5
  • iPXE + Debian preseed
  • Ansible + AWX
  • Redfish / iDRAC
  • NetBox
  • chrony

Measured result

Every number below was measured and reported to the customer. Where we do not have a measured figure, the entry is a fact rather than a percentage — we would rather be precise than impressive.

  • 12 min per-node bring-up, measured on all 40
  • 100% of machine state now described in Git
  • 0 interactive logins required for a new node
  • 9 nodes found on firmware with known CVEs
The reusable part

The provisioning plane matters less than the inventory. Every repeatable fleet we have built stood on one authoritative list of machines; every fragile one had three.

Something here look familiar?

Most of these started with a cluster audit: two weeks, fixed price, and a risk map that names the single points of failure before you commit to any work. Keep the report either way.